Wells’ Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism

Clinical Decision Rule

Wells’ Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Stratify risk for suspected acute pulmonary embolism and determine whether to order a high-sensitivity D-dimer or CT Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA).

How to Use & Clinical Guidelines (Two-Tier vs Three-Tier)

Diagnostic Algorithm (NICE & ESC Guidelines)

  1. Calculate Score: Tally the clinical criteria based on bedside exam and patient history.
  2. Select Model:
    • Two-Tier Model (Recommended): Score ≤4 indicates PE Unlikely (~12% risk). Check high-sensitivity D-dimer. If normal (<500 ng/mL or age-adjusted), PE is safely ruled out without radiation. If score >4, PE Likely (~37% risk), proceed directly to CTPA.
    • Three-Tier Model: Low (0–1.5 points; 1.3% risk), Moderate (2–6 points; 16.2% risk), High (>6 points; 37.5%–40.6% risk).
  3. PERC Rule Rule-out: If score is 0 (or very low risk), consider applying the PERC Rule before even drawing a D-dimer.

Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Formula (Age > 50)

For patients over 50 years with PE Unlikely, use: Age (years) × 10 µg/L to prevent unnecessary CT scans.

Clinical Assessment

Diagnostic Criteria

1. Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT? +3.0 Points
2. PE is #1 diagnosis or equally likely as alternatives? +3.0 Points
3. Heart rate > 100 beats per minute? +1.5 Points
4. Immobilization ≥3 consecutive days OR surgery in past 4 weeks? +1.5 Points
5. Previous, objectively diagnosed PE or DVT? +1.5 Points
6. Hemoptysis (coughing up blood)? +1.0 Point
7. Malignancy (active, treated in last 6 mos, or palliative)? +1.0 Point
✓ Clinical summary copied to clipboard!
Calculation Output

Risk Stratification

Wells PE Score
0.0 / 12.5 pts
PE Unlikely (Two-Tier Model)
Clinical Stratification Mode 2-Tier
PE Unlikely
Estimated PE Prevalence ~12.1%
Primary Next Step D-Dimer Test

💡 Management & Clinical Guidance

PE Unlikely (Score ≤ 4): Order a high-sensitivity D-Dimer test (consider age-adjusted cutoff if age > 50). If D-Dimer is negative, acute PE can be ruled out safely without ionizing radiation. If positive, order CTPA.
View Point Score Breakdown
1. Clinical DVT symptoms0.0
2. Alternative diagnosis less likely0.0
3. Heart rate > 100 bpm0.0
4. Recent surgery or bed rest0.0
5. Previous PE or DVT0.0
6. Hemoptysis0.0
7. Active cancer0.0
Total Score0.0
Cutoffs Summary: Two-tier: ≤4 pts = PE Unlikely (D-dimer rule-out); >4 pts = PE Likely (CT Pulmonary Angiography). Three-tier: Low (0–1.5 pts, ~1.3% risk); Moderate (2–6 pts, ~16.2% risk); High (>6 pts, ~37.5%–40.6% risk).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model should I use: Two-Tier or Three-Tier?
Major contemporary clinical guidelines (such as ESC, NICE, and ACEP) prefer the Two-Tier model (cut-off score 4). It provides clearer, binary decision pathways: PE Unlikely leads to high-sensitivity D-Dimer testing, while PE Likely directs the clinician straight to CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) or bedside compression ultrasonography.
What is the PERC Rule and when can it be used?
The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) is applied when the clinician’s pre-test probability is already very low (<15% or Wells score <2). If a low-risk patient meets all 8 PERC criteria (age <50, pulse <100, SpO2 ≥95%, no hemoptysis, no exogenous estrogen, no prior DVT/PE, no unilateral leg swelling, no surgery/trauma within 4 weeks), the risk of PE is <1.8% and even D-Dimer testing is unnecessary.
How is the Age-Adjusted D-Dimer calculated?
In patients older than 50 years categorized as PE Unlikely, standard D-dimer cutoffs (500 ng/mL) result in high false-positive rates due to natural aging. The validated ADJUST-PE formula is: Age × 10 µg/L (or ng/mL) FEU. For example, a 72-year-old has a normal threshold of <720 µg/L.
Can a negative D-dimer rule out PE if the Wells score is > 4?
No. D-dimer should not be used as a stand-alone rule-out test in patients with a high pre-test probability (PE Likely or Wells score >4). The false-negative rate in high-risk patients is clinically unacceptable; these patients require definitive imaging (CTPA or V/Q scan).
Evidence & Literature

References

  1. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420.
  2. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):98-107.
  3. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543-603.
  4. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.

Medical Disclaimer: This clinical calculator is intended for educational and decision-support purposes by qualified healthcare professionals. It does not replace independent clinical evaluation, bedside hemodynamic assessment, or institutional protocols.

Scroll to Top